While recently listening to academics extol the virtues of a global economy and outsourcing company sponsored seminar speaking in a televised speech at George Mason University, I suffered from the way in which he appropriately, the question of an independent nation, sovereignty state circumnavigated impressed with your trading nation and sufficiently productive. The semi-monolithic paradigm proposed for the implementation of a global free market system demandConnection between the economies of industrialized countries First, Second and Third World, has been cleverly disguised as a social good by a seemingly innocuous superficial appeal to a utilitarian policy. I could not more strongly oppose this application.

Through the use of David Ricardo and Adam Smith's assumptions on productivity resulting from investment reinvestment capitalist motivations for seeking unlimited earnings, academic experts, who claimed a doctorEconomics and Commerce at the University of Michigan, sponsored, applied this principle to the growth of investment by multinationals. Its transparent apologetic rationalization of the fallacy behind a corporate outsourcing, which will be $ 15.00 per hour jobs in the United States, the people of Third World nations to $ 5.00 per hour, were extremely modest. The unheard of his thesis was of the opinion that the government of a nation (in terms of) Of the United States should legislate laws to improve the economy is a global association of their control in the hands of most private non-governmental organizations like the Federal Reserve or the World Bank.

Reducing the number of jobs available in the lucrative United States by recruiting people from other countries with lower wages, all in order to increase corporate profits, only serves to accomplish two things. Further destabilize the economy of the United States that is already unbalanced,be constructed in the manufacture of a real economic caste system with artificial restrictions on some products can do, and why they are made. In essence, the system effectively a dictatorship in which economic (the unit of economic exchange between states of the system should be similar to the euro) would create standardized products and product, along with the means of production would be corporately controlled . Prevent this type of global economySmall businesses in the development and marketing of successful products. Although there are many existing products and services around the world, there are a limited number of suppliers. In a global system, you want something more, which is represented by Microsoft and Wal-Mart. Microsoft has a virtual monopoly on computer systems that operate around the world, and Walmart has the upper hand in the distribution of software to the public, along with many other products. If aWal-Mart Super Center is moving into an American or foreign metropolitan area, 90 percent of all the other smaller companies sell the same products will be shut down because they do not compete with the prices of the big store on. In a global economy, the only production company would be in a state that the cooperating nation that Microsoft and Walmart. People will be forced to buy from them or have nothing at all.

Companies have shown many times, counterproductiveAll investments of small enterprises. This can be explained historically by the development of 17, 18 and 19 century Mercantilism observed in Great Britain. The king over the centuries, he realized that more taxes into the coffers of the Crown, when retailers were checked and will be operated as an appendage of the government. This was the objective in the colonization of North America, and UK companies trade (multinational corporations at the top), the completion of the company establishing the BritishTrade with other countries were administered by the British Crown. The introduction of British socialism in its early stages, was made in England, when it was evident that small, independent companies that offer no comprehensive social security for consumers. This has naturally led to incremental changes to promote socialized medicine and other areas that were the lives of British subjects is essential. Today, however, the United Kingdom has had a long painful period of goingeconomic adjustment to be clear that the evils of imperialism and business of government unchecked. However, there are few large industries in the United Kingdom, which are not controlled and managed directly and indirectly, through the Parliament and the Queen Elizabeth II

Inevitably, the parent company have been effective in preventing a reduction in the competitiveness of enterprises in a capitalist system, if buy-out efforts fail. Smith and Ricardo, both extolled the power to promote greater competition inLevel of productivity for the capitalists, in order to derive the greatest financial benefits of their investments. Adam Smith explained that the individual must always do what is best for him to profit from an investment of time and money. Later, Princeton, Dr. John Nash came in 1950 soon to say that Smith was fundamentally wrong with its speculation that an individual should be essentially greedy labor only for an investment in an asset that what is best for athe group is to promote the best use of productive investment. Theoriization good product but this only increased profits for businesses through increased cooperation between the participants more corporations.The U.S., or more consumer choice has been drastically reduced, while productivity has increased significantly in all the cooperating companies .

In the paradigm of conferences academics, is the person who conveniently Modelreplaced by a legal person, as the company announced. But in both cases, the person and of society, enters the element of motivational investment in wording that promotes the company and the individual capitalist entrepreneur, to achieve the highest profits without regard for the common good of all necessary another, the affected are the end product of the investment. If all cards are on the table, that the motivation is almost always clearunbridled greed, a simple human condition, which requires that an individual or a company can invest will never be too rich and never reach a high enough profit at the expense of consumers. However, the American constitutional government was theoretically established among men to secure in 1789 to ensure that all Americans are treated equally before the law, so that monopolies, trusts and unions, which have some benefits and would deprive many theoreticallyabsent. This theoretical application of the Government of laissez-faire notion of unbridled capitalism virtually impossible in a regime where the poor actually a great value as the rich aristocrats.
But it is obvious that this is not a practical work in the reality of the American republic today. While the theory of constitutional government is clearly in the Preamble to the Constitution of the United States, in the sense that "the introduction of the law, the insurance of domestic animalsPace, who for the common defense and promote the general welfare, "have shown that the real impact of capitalism radically, that the laws are not really intended to do justice to ensure, but for the social order by maintaining a status quo.

Policies established by a government that actually people who enjoy realistic, by the people and for the people (as with Abraham Lincoln) the benefit of the whole company, consisting of the poor, the middle class, andquite rich. The global economy and a government intended to regulate that economy would certainly not be interested in the plight of the poor will be. The poor have always existed, as a fundamental element of society, the greed, the beginning of time, as a direct result of the deadliest of the seven deadly sins of man, wild. The poor continue to be part of a company which is the economic survival of the fittest. This is the basic orientation of capitalism, in which anEconomic lifeblood of a permanent aristocracy. The global economy will only serve to create and maintain a hierarchy of power classified wealth on which the poor will continue to be used by the caste and that most of the victims. For some in this system, the dirty work to be done. Therefore, understanding the principles of intelligence, a nation with a global economy, show two very interesting aspects of such a group of educated people. First of allCoalescence defines the moral priorities of a man more interested in feeding the appetites of predator control, a company making its investors, such selfless care for the poor segment of the population of a state for themselves. Secondly, the members of this group of people alleged intellectual who report their identity as citizens of a republic or a particular nation-state, with a monolithic, quasi-governmental body that any extensionBoundaries.

The study of the historical economic development of the United States is not encouraging, because if the American republic was founded through a revolution in 1776 were people that the opposition of the richest men in the American colonies. When these people came together at a later date under a federal constitution, making compromises that they had first thought about the plight of the poorest citizens of the new young country and its citizens before the laws legislaturethe benefit of the whole nation. However, the main economic justification of the Convention members, a representative of safeguarding the financial status quo and its eventual recovery. They were not ready, their wealth with any kind of rules that determine a social equality hostile to their financial interests to give up. Their minds were made when the U.S. Constitution, not the satisfaction of basic needs of man run-of-the-mill in September Lower-class Americans, who, with every last bit of their resources and physical strength against the British during the Revolution, but failed the rich aristocracy. The federal division of the country and the laws under the First Congress approved the allocation of a certain number of hectares of land for each man who had fought with the Continental Army, was not as it was implemented into law. After the original Congressional Record, the rich people who have successfully completed '> Right, "lamented that the best land in the hands of the poor, to develop in order to take the best financial end. Therefore, the law was changed very quickly, so that, after improvement of the country only those who had the financial resources available. As the Congress is set to become a receipt for the privileged few to prosper, we can easily understand why an individual who is devoted to hedonism, would seek a political seat inHouse of Representatives and the Senate, as a possible career. For example, I know of a former county prosecutor, who was from Washington state, a county salary of 55,000 $ per year, supported by a coalition of democratic state to run for Congress. A less formidable advocate for the effective prosecution and was elected, it will be re-elected twice and now has a salary of $ 190,000 per year, more plush federal structures and services. Selected as part of the government, there is a plausible, self-servingReason for him not to continue to seek election, except the risk that someone could do a much better job of representing the people of his congressional district? This could be the reason for the good utilitarian, what the greatest good for the greatest number, or a majority of the population of a country is not an argument, when corporate profits are affected.

For example, the introduction of mass transit in the United States a long-term goal may have been the federal --and countries at the same time, Ford Motor Company produces cars with a goal, a machine at an affordable price, for each family or person. Surely the vision that someone in the federal government, the sustainability of the development of motorized transport, urban transport have been proposed to reality. But a planned infrastructure has always been seen as damaging to the economy of the capitalist free market. In fact, after the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, the simpleMention of state planning by the government was seen as evil. Consequently, the production of tens of thousands of cars sponsored and supported the federal legislation, like thousands of poor people has started to work for employment in Michigan in the field of mass production of automobiles.

And cars were produced, people rushed to buy them, not with money but with installment contracts at a price of about a thousand dollars. The price is not affordable for most middle-class Americanscorporate, but also for the installment purchase plan was hatched to allow consumers to immediately receive a product with a substantial down payment and low monthly payment (for the period), with interest to two or more years. Ford Motor Credit Company, a subsidiary of Ford, was created exclusively for that purpose. In addition to ending the sale price for the car, consumers pay thirty or forty per cent more for the car made when all payments have been. ThisIn any event, the Ford Corporation increased the total amount of profits which they promoted as the course of public policy for the reinvestment of business, along with the corporate control over the means of transport.

If a large number of deaths from the use of vehicles conducted in mid-1920 to establish an earlier federal court proceedings, as if the vehicles should be banned by the federal government as dangerous to the public, was a precedent established that the Ford Motor companyand the seven major automobile manufacturers competing on the road to eternal happiness. A federal judge said the car is a necessary evil. Instead, the decision of the court ruling could have explained the need for a federal system bus or a rail system which connects the cities of the country. This, however, severely affected are the prevailing popularity of automobiles and the power of big companies for their preparation.

Since the issue of timeliness, orsomewhere in a hurry or get something in less time, was a concern too urgent, more and more Americans in 1920-beginning, the concept of self-gratification has been a tendency in American society. The state of mind ", why wait for something when you can do it now," came into vogue, which are purchased in the average American use the avenue of the rate of hedonic appetite for what Corporate America has been the provision that must be met, namely food, shelter, Entertainment,and transport staff. Then the Great Depression and grim Black Friday came in 1929 in order to have an alarm to Americans Herold, who were enjoying their homes, appliances, automobiles, and many other items of value without actually owning them. As has been made into a large number of Americans into bankruptcy and out-of-work, when money was scarce, the average consumer, unfortunately clear that the rate was not buying what was advertised to be frivolous, if ever wasrecovered.

The global economy in favor of corporate America Express is a goal that has been nurtured since 1950 in the emerging field of neo-conservatism is unknown in university classrooms, particularly at the University of Chicago, and in meetings for the public, including officials federal executive and senior officers of 'private sector. It's amazing how many chassis level appointed members, selected by the presidents of the United States were, Corporate Officersand CEO before assuming the duties of Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, etc. Look at Dick Cheney, for example. Is not worthy of note as Halliburton, the multinational companies for which the current Vice-President, as CEO, the main contract of State for extensive reconstruction in Iraq? There were at least twelve other companies waiting for the contract. I wonder how Halliburton won the race? Some say that people who know freely, that Cheney had a direct hand in the gameawarded the contract for the company, which has made him a millionaire twice approved. It 'also true that Cheney has a number of stock options in Halliburton, which rose sharply in value after the contract was approved for Iraq. The federal government apparently has allowed Cheney to run away with this obscene transplantation.

Some public officials who say the federal government and corporate officials, including former CEOs, the best cabinet-level official to do. Want tobut must admit that CEOs of companies much more subtle and pragmatic in its attempt to produce large profits for its parent companies, and that their honesty and integrity are questionable. The crimes they commit in the course of time are often so bad that many ordinary people financially through their diabolical reason collusion. And unfortunately, most ran away with their illegal profits. Ken Lay, the Enron Corporation, was a sign exampleabsolute graft and corruption will be brought to justice. The number of murders committed with its-financial activities, he is precious in your hand. As usual the road and accidentally kills a thief who steals, while his crime is compared, very interesting, because there are serious crimes in the streets and in the suites. During a street crime mostly affects one person or a family, a crime suite affect many thousands. I seriously believe that tokenhave been identified and charges levied on corporate crimes visible from the federal government to make public, appears to the public who are striving to reduce economic crime. Unbeknownst to the American public is not informed, there are many other companies ignore the crimes, and in fact encouraged by the government. The global economy would be the worst company of employment law of human society with the approval of the state. Would be the domain of a poorsingle people with basic life (which is what he eats man to know the clothes they wear, where she lives, because it comes from one place to another and, in essence, what he can buy) the ultimate goal of a global society association.

Thanks To : Eureka Upright Vacuum wireless routers